9:40 Nov 23rd, 2011 | 3 notes
occupy…where?
the ever-excellent josh harkinson on the debate over the value of occupying a public space, and what options the occupiers have.
two views of an occupation:
logistics
“If we are not careful, we are going to turn into a homeless shelter and food kitchen, and to be honest, that’s not why I came here.”
versus symbolism
“Having a space that is a show of force, that is big, that is in your face is really important”
and also interesting, how duarte square would be different from zuccotti:
If Trinity allows the occupation, it will be protected from thieves by the surrounding fence. The only tents allowed inside will be large military versions that each sleep 18 people, allowing better oversight of campers and plenty of meeting spaces for daytime use. Anyone who wishes to join the occupation will be required to sign a pledge to actively participate, not use drugs, and keep the peace; those who don’t comply will be removed. And the Duarte occupation will have its own General Assembly composed entirely of occupiers, giving it much better control of itself.
12:24 Nov 22nd, 2011 | 5 notes
“for a movement that now lacks a single center of gravity, the Occupied Office is playing an increasingly important role”
Josh Harkinson:
It’s hardly the movement’s only workspace. The Spokes Council, the movement’s quasi-governing body, held it’s latest meeting at a Times Square auditorium owned by a local chapter of the Service Employees International Union. Students at Manhattan’s New School have occupied a classroom that they are using for teach-ins. Two Manhattan churches have opened their doors to the camp’s homeless. And meetings continue at the park, in the nearby atrium of 60 Wall Street, and in other spaces owned by religious and labor groups. The Center for Constitutional Rights will soon roll out an online listing service to connect occupiers with other groups that can offer free space.
11:20 Nov 2nd, 2011 | 4 notes

(caption of the day.)
My colleague Adam Serwer reported this morning on one of the more bizarre domestic terror plots in recent memory—the alleged plot by four senior citizens in north Georgia to produce and spread ricin and botulinium toxin in Atlanta and Washington, DC, in order to kill millions of people and “save the Constitution.” (Because that’s not strange enough, the plot was hatched at a Waffle House.)
to this i would add, of COURSE it was hatched at a Waffle House. it’s georgia, for goodness’ sake.
full story: Confederate Flag Activist Behind Georgia Terror Plot